Boeing 737 Max 9 Issue Reveals Important Lessons on Quality Management

• The incident involving a door plug blowing off an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 in early January has sparked significant concern and investigations into the quality management processes at Boeing.
• Layered process audits (LPAs) are emphasized as a vital strategy for preventing issues like those seen with the 737 Max 9 by adding multiple checks during production to catch potential nonconformances early.
• The Boeing 737 Max 9 issue serves as a cautionary tale for manufacturers, highlighting that upfront investments in quality management, such as auditing design processes and implementing digital LPA systems, are crucial for avoiding costly fixes and regulatory scrutiny down the line.

The incident involving a door plug blowing off an Alaska Airlines 737 Max 9 in early January has sparked significant concern and investigations into the quality management processes at Boeing. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grounded 171 other 737 Max 9s and initiated an audit of the aircraft’s production line, emphasizing the critical need for verification during the manufacturing and design phases. Boeing’s response included deploying a team to the supplier responsible for the aircraft’s door plugs, introducing new checks in their production lines, and opening its facilities for customer inspections. Boeing CEO Stan Deal’s letter to employees underscored the addition of more layers of scrutiny to the thousands of inspections already performed across every 737 airplanes, highlighting the concept of layered process audits (LPAs) as crucial for reducing manufacturing risks.

Layered process audits (LPAs) are emphasized as a vital strategy for preventing issues like those seen with the 737 Max 9 by adding multiple checks during production to catch potential nonconformances early. LPAs involve verifying critical process elements, such as the presence and correct torque of bolts, through inspections by multiple personnel. This method aims to minimize human error and ensure that all manufacturing steps are correctly followed. The incident with the 737 Max 9 suggests that problems could have been identified and prevented at the manufacturing stage, pointing to the importance of effective LPAs and the need for additional layers of verification to ensure the reliability of the detection processes.

Moreover, the article stresses the significance of verification in the design process, including design risk assessment and design failure mode and effects analysis (DFMEA), to identify and control risks early on. The lack of a verification strategy, ineffective LPAs, and insufficient leadership support for quality processes are potential contributors to manufacturing problems. The Boeing 737 Max 9 issue serves as a cautionary tale for manufacturers, highlighting that upfront investments in quality management, such as auditing design processes and implementing digital LPA systems, are crucial for avoiding costly fixes and regulatory scrutiny down the line. The key takeaway for manufacturers is that an ounce of prevention in quality management is worth a pound of cure, underscoring the importance of robust quality assurance practices in safeguarding a company’s reputation and future.

Read the full article