Does an actually decent GRC platform exist?

• Many users expressed dissatisfaction with existing GRC platforms, citing issues like lack of flexibility, insufficient features, and platforms being overly focused on compliance without addressing governance and risk effectively.
• Common alternatives suggested included using Microsoft Excel, SharePoint, or Power BI for simpler, customizable GRC needs, while some favored tools like ZenGRC, Hyperproof, or SimpleRisk for more structured requirements.
• Several users noted that no GRC platform fits all organizational needs, emphasizing that success depends on how well the tool integrates with an organization’s processes and the effort put into implementation and customization.

Some widespread frustration exists with Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) platforms, which many find inflexible or overly complex. Critics pointed to issues such as a lack of adaptability, poor evidence integration for audits, and a focus on compliance that overlooks governance and risk management. While some platforms like ZenGRC, Hyperproof, and OneTrust were mentioned as viable options, others preferred simpler tools like Excel or SharePoint due to their customization capabilities.

Users also noted that GRC platforms often require significant upfront effort to configure and don’t always provide the expected value during audits. Some platforms, like Drata and SecureFrame, were seen as useful for initial compliance (e.g., SOC 2) but less effective as organizations mature. Open-source options like Eramba and SimpleRisk were mentioned for cost-conscious users, while government-specific tools like JCAM were noted for their simplicity and effectiveness. The consensus is that GRC tools are imperfect, and success depends on aligning them with specific organizational needs and processes.

Read the full article