Social Audits: 4 Reasons Why Testing, Inspection, & Certification Firms Should NOT Do Them

• Social compliance audits by Testing, Inspection, and Certification (TIC) firms often lack objectivity and transparency, leading to unreliable outcomes.
• Social audits in countries like China are prone to manipulation. Workers are coached to give misleading responses and politically sensitive issues are often censored.
• Brands should shift focus from excessive auditing to supporting suppliers and responsible purchasing practices, possibly involving independent entities with specialized expertise.

Social compliance audits, particularly when conducted by TIC firms, are fraught with issues compromising their effectiveness and integrity. Unlike audits for standards like ISO 9001, which rely on tangible evidence, social audits are largely document-based and dependent on readily manipulated worker interviews. In countries like China, workers are often coached to provide specific answers, and auditors are discouraged from investigating further due to a lack of tangible evidence, leading to unreliable audit reports.

Furthermore, social audits often involve politically sensitive topics, especially in regions like China, where issues such as forced labor may arise. The predominantly local auditors are unlikely to report these issues accurately, and even if they do, their reports are often censored by their supervisors to avoid jeopardizing the firm’s standing with local governments. This self-censorship prevents brands from receiving honest assessments of their suppliers’ practices.

The high stakes in social audits, where poor results can cost factories significant business, further exacerbate the problem. Auditors, under pressure to deliver favorable results, may overlook falsified records and misleading interviews. The involvement of consultants who prepare manufacturers for these audits, often choosing the auditing firm themselves, further compromises the independence of the audit process.

To address these challenges, brands should reduce their reliance on TIC firms for social audits and instead invest in supporting their suppliers with responsible purchasing practices. This could involve partnering with independent entities outside the TIC industry, such as law firms with expertise in labor law, to conduct more transparent and reliable audits. This approach improves the quality of the audits and promotes more sustainable and ethical practices across the supply chain.

Read the full article