This forum thread delves into setting intervals for Management Reviews as per ISO 9001:2015. The discussion was initiated by a user who faced an audit issue due to not holding Management Review Meetings (MRM) quarterly, as stated in their procedures manual. The user expressed the challenges of having these meetings due to time constraints and sought advice on whether it’s mandatory to set a specific time interval for these meetings or if they can be held at “planned intervals.”
Several forum members shared their experiences and insights. One user mentioned that their organization holds these reviews annually, even though they find them more beneficial when conducted every 3 or 4 months. Another user highlighted that they don’t have a specific “management review” meeting but instead cover the topics in their general meetings. They maintain a checklist and record of the required topics, discussing and recording them as they arise in meetings. While effective for some, this approach may require a shift in mindset and consistent tracking. Another perspective offered was to make the management review more of a business system meeting rather than strictly adhering to ISO mandates.
The thread underscores the importance of flexibility and adaptability in implementing quality management standards. Organizations can tailor their approach to management reviews based on their unique operational challenges and needs, ensuring compliance while deriving value from the process. This discussion is highly relevant to the quality management world, emphasizing the need for practical solutions in real-world scenarios.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.